WIRED Reviews Samsung Galaxy S26 Cases: Qi2 Limitations and Fit Concerns Highlighted
A comprehensive guide from WIRED evaluates protective cases for the Samsung Galaxy S26, S26 Plus, and S26 Ultra, recommending specific models while advising against others due to build quality and accessory interference.
WIRED has published an updated review of protective cases and screen protectors for the Samsung Galaxy S26, S26 Plus, and S26 Ultra, evaluating options from brands including Spigen, Dbrand, Mous, Burga, OtterBox, and Casetify. The guide, updated in August 2026 to include new entries from Burga, Mous, and OtterBox, assesses fit, comfort, and button responsiveness across the device range.
A primary finding from the review is that the Samsung Galaxy S26 lineup lacks native Qi2 charging support. Consequently, users must rely on magnetic cases to access Qi2 charging speeds and associated benefits. The publication notes that the S26’s camera bump design, a carryover from the previous S25 series, creates compatibility issues with various magnetic accessories, including wallets and rectangular power banks.
WIRED’s methodology for this assessment avoids drop testing due to resource constraints and the difficulty of controlling variables outside a laboratory environment. Instead, the review focuses on the precision of button presses, the tactile feel of materials, and the overall build quality of the cases. The publication explicitly states that neither cases nor screen protectors can guarantee protection against screen shattering.
Specific recommendations include Dbrand’s Ghost Case 2.0 for the S26 Ultra, which is praised for its sturdy edges, anti-yellowing guarantee, and accessible S Pen slot. Conversely, the Samsung Slim Magnet Case, priced at $70, is advised against due to its flimsy and slippery construction. The review also highlights that Spigen’s volume buttons can be difficult to press, while the OtterBox Profile Series suffers from resistant buttons.
The guide also addresses ethical concerns, noting that Casetify has faced allegations of stealing designs from other companies. For screen protection, Dbrand’s Prism 2.0 is recommended for its ease of installation, though users are advised to re-register fingerprints and increase touch sensitivity in settings after application.
