US states challenge Trump rules on endangered species protections

Attorneys general from 20 Democratic-led US states and Washington, DC, have filed two lawsuits challenging Trump administration rules that narrow protections under the Endangered Species Act.

The cases target final rules announced by the Departments of the Interior and Commerce less than two months ago. The states argue the changes could make it easier for companies to develop land containing endangered species’ habitats.

One lawsuit challenges a narrower definition of “harm” under the 1973 act. The states say the change could allow activities including mining and oil drilling in sensitive habitats where they are not directed immediately and intentionally at particular animals.

The second lawsuit challenges rules affecting newly threatened species and the designation of critical habitats. It contests the removal of broad protections unless species-specific regulations are created, as well as a requirement to consider objections from private companies before areas are declared critical habitats.

The Endangered Species Act has been credited with helping restore condor, grizzly bear and humpback whale populations and is regarded as a cornerstone of US conservation policy. The Trump administration has pledged to reduce environmental regulation and prioritise economic growth, including expanded oil exploration and private development.

The administration says the lawsuits seek to preserve regulatory overreach and argues that federal agencies should implement the act as written. Environmental groups have also filed separate challenges, while the practical effect of the rules remains unresolved as the legal cases proceed, Al Jazeera Global News reported.