US House approves $1.15 trillion defence bill amid sovereignty and war concerns
A narrow 216-to-212 vote passes the 2027 National Defence Authorisation Act, drawing sharp criticism from both progressive Democrats and conservative Republicans over its cost and provisions.
The US House of Representatives has narrowly passed the 2027 National Defence Authorisation Act (NDAA), approving a $1.15 trillion military spending package that significantly expands defence cooperation with Israel and provides funding for the ongoing war on Iran. The legislation advanced on Wednesday with a vote of 216 to 212, reflecting deep divisions within Congress as the bill moves to the Senate for further consideration.
The vote followed party lines with notable exceptions, as six Democrats supported the measure while seven Republicans opposed it. The legislation reflects President Donald Trump’s request to increase the military budget from $900 billion in the previous year to $1.5 trillion, though the final House version falls short of that figure. The bill also incorporates the SAVE America Act, which imposes new voting restrictions, and includes aid for Ukraine, adding to the contentious nature of the package.
Republican Representative Thomas Massie, a vocal critic of the war on Iran, condemned the legislation’s provisions regarding Israel. In a social media post, Massie stated that the vote tragically merges US military technology and supply chains with those of Israel. He specifically targeted Section 219 of the bill, describing it as a "betrayal of our sovereignty" and expressing hope that the legislation would fail in the Senate.
Senate Democrats have already moved to block debate on the NDAA, signalling a difficult path for the bill’s passage. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer characterised the legislation as a "permission slip" for the government’s war on Iran, which was launched by the US and Israel in late February 2026. Democrats have criticised the high cost of the package, particularly at a time when the White House is pursuing cuts to social programmes.
The NDAA is traditionally considered must-pass legislation, but this year’s version faces an uncertain future due to its expanded scope and political controversy. With the Senate having already blocked debate, it remains unclear how the chamber will reconcile the House-passed version with potential amendments or differing spending levels. The bill’s provisions regarding military assistance to Israel and voting restrictions continue to draw scrutiny from lawmakers and voters alike.
