Finance

US Justice Department orders top law firms to face depositions over past agreements

Department of Justice instructs leaders of major firms to attend proceedings regarding capitulation deals reached more than 12 months ago

Author
Owen Mercer
Markets and Finance Editor
Published
Draft
Source: Financial Times · original
Big Law braces for second fight with Trump over capitulation deals
Second escalation in tensions between regulators and Big Law

The US Department of Justice has directed the leaders of major law firms to attend depositions concerning agreements reached more than a year ago, marking a significant escalation in the relationship between the government and the legal industry.

According to a report by the Financial Times, this development represents a second major confrontation between the Justice Department and top-tier firms, often referred to as Big Law. The instruction requires firm leaders to sit for depositions regarding what have been described as capitulation deals.

The agreements in question were finalised over 12 months prior to the current directive. While the source material does not detail the specific terms or nature of these past settlements, the new requirement for leadership testimony suggests a renewed regulatory scrutiny of how these deals were structured and executed.

This move indicates that the Justice Department is revisiting matters that were previously considered resolved or settled. By targeting the leaders of these prominent firms, the department is seeking direct testimony regarding the circumstances surrounding the earlier capitulation deals.

The Financial Times characterises this latest development as a second fight, implying that a prior conflict or disagreement occurred between the DOJ and these firms. The current depositions signal that the regulatory relationship remains contentious, with the government pursuing further accountability despite the passage of time since the original agreements.

As the legal industry braces for this next phase, the focus remains on the implications for firm leadership and the potential precedents set by these proceedings. The outcome of these depositions could have broader implications for how major law firms engage with federal regulators in future settlements.

Continue reading

More from Finance

Read next: Bank of France realises $15.1 billion gain in gold repatriation strategy
Read next: Wall Street remains bullish on Viking Therapeutics despite June rally and recent dip
Read next: Fed Chair Warsh bets on AI productivity as colleagues warn of inflation risks