World

Trump suggests White House UFC arena may become permanent fixture

Critics highlight contradictions with previous federal architecture orders as social media users accuse the administration of neglecting domestic economic issues in favour of high-profile events.

Author
Adrian Cole
Political Correspondent
Published
Draft
Source: France 24 International · original
Trump compares White House UFC arena to Eiffel Tower, hints it could stay permanently
President’s TikTok video comparing the South Lawn structure to the Eiffel Tower sparks debate over governance priorities and architectural consistency

US President Donald Trump has suggested that a massive UFC arena currently under construction on the White House South Lawn may never be removed, drawing sharp criticism regarding the use of historic grounds and the administration’s focus on policy matters. Speaking in a video posted to his official TikTok account on Wednesday, the President compared the temporary structure to the Eiffel Tower, arguing that the Paris landmark was also originally intended to be dismantled but was retained due to its enduring value.

The arena, described as an open-air metal structure larger than the White House itself, is being built for the "UFC FREEDOM 250" event scheduled for June 14. The date coincides with the President’s 80th birthday and the United States’ 250th anniversary. Trump, who has a longstanding relationship with UFC CEO Dana White and has frequently attended mixed martial arts events in recent years, stated in the video: "Maybe we'll never ever take it down," recounting a narrative that the Eiffel Tower was supposed to be removed immediately after the 1889 world’s fair.

Historical records indicate a discrepancy in the President’s comparison. While the Eiffel Tower was commissioned as a temporary structure for the 1889 Paris Exposition, it held a 20-year permit and was ultimately retained for its strategic utility in scientific experiments and radio telegraphy, rather than being kept solely as a spontaneous decision after its initial purpose expired. The White House construction, set to remain for approximately one week, has nonetheless prompted questions about its potential permanence.

The suggestion has triggered negative reactions from social media users, with critics accusing the President of damaging a historic site and ignoring pressing domestic concerns such as rising healthcare costs and energy bills. Observers have also pointed to a contradiction with the "Making Federal Architecture Beautiful Again" executive order signed by Trump last year, which aimed to protect the classical architecture of federal buildings.

This potential alteration to the White House grounds follows a series of other controversial modifications, including a 90,000 square foot ballroom project, renovations to the Rose Garden, and the gilding of the Oval Office. It remains unclear whether the President’s comments were a serious policy proposal, a joke, or a social media strategy designed to provoke critics, a tactic often employed by his administration.

Continue reading

More from World

Read next: Police investigate river body as potential link to Hyogo double murder
Read next: Israel marks sixth invasion of Lebanon in 48-year period
Read next: Global commemoration marks decade since death of Muhammad Ali