Investigations

ProPublica guide reveals transparency gaps in US private school oversight

A new resource from the nonprofit newsroom highlights how many US states leave accountability to parents, with no federal mandate for private schools to report student performance or undergo mandatory safety inspections.

Author
Jonah Pike
Investigations Editor
Published
Draft
Source: ProPublica · original
How to Research Private Schools Like an Investigative Reporter
Investigative reporters outline methods for families to verify safety, finances and staff backgrounds where regulatory checks are absent

ProPublica has published an investigative guide aimed at parents and guardians seeking to research private schools, underscoring significant disparities in regulatory oversight across the United States. The publication notes that unlike public institutions, private schools are not federally mandated to assess or report student performance in core subjects such as reading, mathematics and science. Consequently, many jurisdictions adopt a hands-off approach, leaving families to verify school safety, financial stability and staff backgrounds using public records and court documents.

The guide draws on months of reporting by ProPublica’s investigative team, which utilised data, public records and interviews to examine hundreds of schools. The investigation uncovered instances of serious issues, including a school in Arkansas where the founder was accused of running a makeshift fight club, and a former charter school superintendent in the Midwest who was fired for mismanaging funds yet subsequently received public money in Florida. The Arkansas school’s new education director stated the founder is no longer involved in operations, while the former superintendent claimed her actions were approved by the board.

Advocates for systems directing public money to private schools argue that family choice serves as the primary accountability mechanism. However, the guide advises that relying solely on market forces can be risky, as marketing brochures rarely disclose negative information such as a principal’s concerning history or financial instability that could lead to mid-year closures. The resource encourages parents to check state-specific regulations, noting that requirements for teacher qualifications and financial soundness vary significantly by jurisdiction.

ProPublica outlines several verification techniques for prospective families. These include searching for court cases to identify criminal histories, broken financial contracts or disputes over tuition, such as those reported by The Washington Post. The guide also points to the ProPublica Private School Demographics database, which compares private school student bodies with local public school districts. This data is derived from the voluntary federal Private School Universe Survey, meaning not all schools participate and the information is updated only every two years, limiting its current relevance.

The publication emphasises that while some states maintain stronger laws and better information than others, free public records and databases can prove useful regardless of location. ProPublica invites families who uncover interesting information during their research to share their findings, noting that the newsroom continues to report on the expanding private school landscape. The guide serves as a practical tool for navigating an opaque system where accountability is often shifted from regulators to parents.

Continue reading

More from Investigations

Read next: DHS launches probe into immigration scam network as fraud complaints surge
Read next: Investigation finds US states failing to regulate private schools receiving public vouchers
Read next: Arkansas Voucher Oversight Under Scrutiny After School Founder’s Sentencing