Politics

Parliamentary staff demand security overhaul amid surge in abuse and distress

Westminster-based wellness working group calls for mandatory protection protocols, citing rising threats and implementation gaps in current safety measures.

Author
Adrian Cole
Political Correspondent
Published
Draft
Source: The Guardian Politics · original
Politics
No image available
Survey reveals half of MPs’ workers face clinical psychological distress as PM prepares review following Widdecombe murder

Parliamentary staff are urging an urgent tightening of security protocols following a survey that reveals half of MPs’ workers are experiencing clinical levels of psychological distress. The findings, released by the Westminster-based wellness working group (WWG), come as Prime Minister Andy Burnham prepares to announce a government review of security arrangements for members of parliament. The review is expected to be triggered by the recent murder of former minister Ann Widdecombe, with Joshua Kerry, 28, from Rotherham, South Yorkshire, charged with her crime.

The survey of more than 500 parliamentary staff members, conducted by psychologist Dr Ashley Weinberg of the University of Salford, found that 78 per cent of respondents had received threatening communications. Nearly one in three staff members reported frequently or always fearing for their own safety or that of their colleagues, a figure that has risen from 18.7 per cent five years ago. The WWG described the increase in distress as significant and sudden, attributing it to unsustainable workloads and routine exposure to abuse, including racist and sexist language, suicide threats, and traumatic disclosures.

Specific incidents highlighted in the data underscore the severity of the environment. Seventy-three staffers reported being very frequently or frequently exposed to racist or prejudiced language from visitors, with an additional 188 reporting such exposure sometimes. One in four staff members stated they had felt pressure to comply with requests that might compromise their safety. One respondent noted being physically attacked twice in the past year, while others described security operatives refusing to attend official events unless the MP was present, leaving staff vulnerable when acting as proxies for their employers.

Despite the clear risks, implementation of safety recommendations remains inconsistent. Seventeen staff members reported that none of the safety recommendations made to their MP had been implemented, while 59 respondents, representing 11 per cent of the total, said only some measures had been adopted. The WWG is calling for Commons authorities to have the power to impose tighter security when MPs or their office managers fail to comply, arguing that protection should routinely extend to staff as though the MP is present.

A House of Commons spokesperson acknowledged the concerns raised by staff, stating that the ability of members’ staff to carry out their roles safely is fundamental to democracy. The spokesperson emphasised that abuse and intimidation are completely unacceptable and confirmed that authorities are working closely with the WWG to strengthen support. The Prime Minister’s planned review is expected to address these systemic gaps ahead of any legislative or procedural changes.

Continue reading

More from Politics

Read next: Burnham revives National Economic Council as No 10 North opens in Manchester
Read next: CT Group faces scrutiny over alleged payments to journalists for favourable coverage
Read next: Over 100 UK millionaires urge Burnham to implement wealth tax in open letter