Former OpenAI board member Shivon Zilis testifies Elon Musk sought Tesla acquisition of OpenAI
In the second week of proceedings, Zilis told a judge and jury that Musk wanted OpenAI to become a subsidiary of Tesla, raising questions about the company's independent status
Former OpenAI board member Shivon Zilis has provided testimony in the ongoing legal dispute between Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. During the second week of the trial, Zilis alleged that Musk sought to make OpenAI a subsidiary of Tesla. The proceedings highlight the complex personal dynamics between the parties, noting Zilis's romantic relationship with Musk and their shared four children.
The testimony specifically addresses Musk's desire for Tesla to acquire or absorb OpenAI as a subsidiary. This account comes as the trial continues between Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman regarding the origins and governance of OpenAI. The case involves significant personal dynamics, given the romantic relationship and shared children between Musk and Zilis.
Zilis took the stand before a judge and jury to detail these claims. She is romantically involved with Musk and is the mother of his four children. Her evidence suggests a strategic intent by Musk to integrate the artificial intelligence firm directly under the Tesla corporate umbrella during the period in question.
The trial is currently in its second week, featuring testimony from key figures including the former board member and the opposing CEOs. The weight of Zilis's testimony regarding the acquisition intent remains dependent on how it aligns with other evidence presented in the court. The final outcome of the lawsuit and the specific legal rulings regarding the relationship between Tesla and OpenAI are not yet determined.
Claims regarding Musk's intent to acquire OpenAI are based solely on Zilis's testimony and are not yet established as fact by the court. The nature of the romantic involvement and family ties, while reported, are personal details that may be subject to interpretation or further legal scrutiny regarding potential conflicts of interest. All facts presented are within the context of the specific timeline indicated by the source material.
The report draws on information from France 24 International, which covered the proceedings as they unfolded. The institution noted that the testimony occurred in May 2026, providing a snapshot of the legal arguments currently being advanced in the courtroom.
