Former FBI Director James Comey surrenders to face threat charge over Trump seashell post
Prosecutors allege an Instagram image from May 2025 encouraging violence against the 47th president; legal experts question the evidentiary threshold

Former FBI Director James Comey surrendered to authorities in Virginia on Wednesday to face a criminal charge alleging that an Instagram post he shared in May 2025 constituted a threat to the life of President Donald Trump. The former director did not speak during his brief appearance at court, but his attorney stated that the former director plans to argue the prosecution is politically motivated and vindictive. This development marks the second time the Justice Department has brought criminal charges against Comey, who is a longtime critic of the current administration.
The charge stems from an image Comey briefly shared on social media which depicted seashells arranged on a beach to spell out "86 47". Prosecutors interpret this slang phrase as a call to "get rid of" the 47th president, thereby encouraging violence against him. Comey denies wrongdoing, stating he was unaware of the numbers' specific meaning and opposed any violence. Following public outcry, Comey deleted the image and posted a note admitting he did not realise some folks associate those numbers with violence.
Attorney General Todd Blanche publicly dismissed claims of political motivation, emphasising that threatening the President is a serious crime regardless of the medium. Blanche told CBS News that anyone suggesting the case is merely about seashells is missing the point, noting that one cannot threaten the President of the United States. He stated the charges are absolutely, positively not politically motivated, a stance that contrasts with Comey's assertion that the prosecution is punishment for speaking out against Trump.
The maximum penalty for the charge is five years in prison or a fine, or both. While the government maintains the seriousness of the allegation, some legal experts and lawmakers have cast doubt on the strength of the case. Republican Senator Thom Tillis expressed concern that the case sets a fairly low bar for criminal liability if the evidence is limited to the image in the sand, suggesting there may be more to it than just the picture.
This legal action occurs against a backdrop of heightened scrutiny within the US justice system and concurrent security concerns. Concurrently, a joint FBI and terrorism task force is investigating a separate incident involving a gunman at the White House Correspondents Association Dinner who charged towards the ballroom where Trump was present. Attorney General Blanche referenced this Saturday attack when discussing the gravity of threats against the President.
Comey's previous indictment regarding lying to Congress was dismissed in November by US District Judge Cameron Currie due to the invalid appointment of prosecutor Lindsey Halligan. The judge ruled that Halligan was not authorised to present the charges to the grand jury. This procedural error led to the dismissal of the earlier case, distinguishing it from the current threat charge which proceeded to this stage of surrender and prosecution.


