Conservatives deny ideological purge as Lord Barwell loses whip
Party leadership cites conduct failures and public dissent, while Barwell warns of alienating centre-right voters following Kemi Badenoch’s hardline stance on net zero.
The Conservative Party has firmly rejected allegations of an ideological purge after Lord Gavin Barwell was removed from the party whip. The decision follows repeated warnings from party leader Kemi Badenoch that members who support net zero targets or oppose the UK’s departure from the European Convention on Human Rights are no longer welcome. Lord Barwell, a former minister and peer, described the expulsion as evidence of an “intolerance of criticism,” arguing that the leadership’s approach risks alienating millions of potential centre-right voters.
Barwell, who served as Theresa May’s chief of staff before being elevated to the House of Lords in 2019, stated he was saddened by the move. He claimed the decision was motivated by his criticism of Badenoch’s stance on environmental policy, noting that he had also praised the leader on other occasions. Writing on LinkedIn, Barwell argued that while Badenoch was effectively holding the government to account, her messaging was failing to improve the party’s opinion poll ratings. He suggested that previous leaders, from John Major to May, would not have removed the whip for such dissent.
In a letter to Barwell, Susan Williams, the Conservative chief whip in the Lords, confirmed that he would not resume the whip upon taking his oath. Williams cited a “series of public statements directed against both the leader of the opposition and the Conservative party” as a primary factor. The letter also highlighted conduct issues, specifically noting that Barwell had failed to meet with Williams upon his return from a leave of absence, despite being asked to do so.
A Conservative source dismissed speculation that Barwell was targeted for his moderate views, calling such ideas “complete rubbish.” The source maintained that the expulsion was due to wider conduct problems rather than ideological differences. The letter from Williams emphasised that while robust debate is a tradition within the party, there is a distinct boundary between disagreement and conduct that undermines the discipline and mutual respect required for a serious political organisation.
The incident has sparked debate within the party’s inner circle, with ConservativeHome publishing an article calling for Badenoch to distance the party from Proper UK, a centrist grouping led by Ruth Davidson and Andy Street. Barwell, who first learned of the whip’s removal via a forwarded Daily Mail article, urged the leader to build a “broad church” that encourages healthy strategic debate. He warned that excluding valid criticism could hinder the party’s ability to connect with voters attracted to its economic message but put off by other policy positions.