The Athletic investigation into Russini reporting delayed by weeks
The New York Times-owned outlet faces scrutiny over its vetting processes and editorial standards following the prolonged probe into allegations involving former reporter Dianna Russini and New England Patriots coach Mike Vrabel.
The Athletic’s internal investigation into the reporting practices surrounding Dianna Russini remains ongoing, with executive editor Steven Ginsberg estimating the process is several weeks from conclusion. The probe was initiated following allegations regarding Russini’s relationship with New England Patriots coach Mike Vrabel, which were publicised by the New York Post in March 2020. Russini resigned in April 2020, maintaining strong denials of any wrongdoing and attributing the controversy to media speculation.
Ginsberg confirmed to Oli Coleman of the New York Post that the investigation requires a careful review of the evidence. He stated that The Athletic will issue updates upon completion and reiterated the outlet’s commitment to correcting any errors identified during the process. The extended timeline has generated internal concerns within The Athletic regarding management oversight and the handling of editorial standards.
The delay has raised questions about the vetting process and what management knew, when they knew it, and whether appropriate oversight was exercised. The Athletic, which is owned by The New York Times, continues to face scrutiny over these issues, with the situation highlighting pre-existing tensions between the two organisations regarding editorial standards.
Speculation suggests that even if The Athletic does not publish a final report, the findings may be shared within the broader New York Times organisation or leaked. There is also the possibility that The Athletic may revisit and amend past reporting related to the matter, although it remains unclear if formal corrections will be issued.
Hovering over the situation is the potential for litigation, particularly if Russini continues to adhere to her denials and pursues a defamation case against those who contradict them. The outcome of the investigation will likely determine the extent to which The Athletic and The New York Times must address these governance and reputational risks.
