Politics

Labour MPs face Monday ultimatum over Starmer leadership challenge

With the Prime Minister vowing to remain in post, the parliamentary party must decide between a formal ballot or alternative pressure tactics to force a change

Author
Adrian Cole
Political Correspondent
Published
Draft
Source: The Guardian Politics · original
Politics
No image available
Backbencher Catherine West threatens to run for leader unless a cabinet minister steps forward following local election defeats

Following a series of disappointing local election results, backbencher Catherine West has issued a stark deadline to the Labour leadership. West, who previously served as a junior Foreign Office minister, announced that she will launch a formal challenge against Prime Minister Keir Starmer if no cabinet minister steps forward by Monday. This ultimatum marks the latest escalation in internal tensions within the party as it grapples with its most severe electoral test since returning to power in 2024.

The path to removing Starmer is complicated by the Labour party rulebook, which makes ejecting a leader notoriously difficult. To trigger a formal leadership contest, a challenger must secure written support from 20 per cent of the parliamentary party, a threshold currently standing at 81 MPs. While West has threatened to run herself, there is no confirmed evidence that she has secured the requisite number of nominations to force a ballot. Consequently, her move is being viewed by some observers as a strategy to test the waters or act as a stalking horse for other potential candidates.

Allies of Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham, health secretary Wes Streeting, and former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner claim to possess the necessary backing to mount a formal challenge. However, the sitting leader automatically qualifies for a contest if he wishes to remain, and Starmer has publicly pledged to stand for re-election. This dynamic means any successful challenge would require rivals to defeat the Prime Minister directly in a leadership vote, a significantly higher bar than the anonymous no-confidence motions available to Conservative MPs.

In the absence of a confirmed ballot, alternative routes to ousting the Prime Minister are being considered by disaffected members of the parliamentary party. These strategies include mass ministerial resignations, akin to the crisis that brought down Boris Johnson in 2022, or a coordinated campaign by regional leaders calling for Starmer's resignation. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has already publicly urged Starmer to step down, though this has not yet triggered a wave of resignations from the cabinet.

Approximately 40 Labour MPs have expressed dissatisfaction with Starmer since the recent electoral losses, yet most are adopting a wait-and-see approach rather than committing to an immediate public challenge. The party faces a dilemma between staging a public display of disloyalty or attempting private persuasion to induce a voluntary departure. Historical precedents suggest that private pressure can be effective, as seen in the quiet ousting of former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith and Liberal Democrat Charles Kennedy, though Starmer has indicated he will stay in post come what may.

The situation remains fluid as the party navigates the fallout from what has been described as a mauling in the Welsh heartlands. While a formal vote of no confidence would be easier to call than a leadership election, it lacks binding power and could allow Starmer to cling to office, as his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn did in 2016. The coming days will determine whether the parliamentary party chooses to formalise a contest or relies on internal pressure to reshape the leadership.

Continue reading

More from Politics

Read next: White House warns UK social media ban on under-16s burdens US tech firms
Read next: Major UK unions reject Reform UK affiliation over workers’ rights concerns
Read next: Conservatives push to scrap public sector equality duty amid Labour backlash