Big 12 athletic directors unite against Sorsby eligibility amid disciplinary review
Commissioner Brett Yormark confirms structured process as executive board prepares to consider sanctions under bylaw 3.6
Big 12 athletic directors convened on Tuesday for a call with commissioner Brett Yormark, expressing unified opposition to Texas Tech quarterback Brendan Sorsby participating in the 2026 season. The discussion followed a federal court ruling that granted Sorsby a temporary injunction, preserving his eligibility despite prior admissions regarding sports gambling. With the exception of Texas Tech’s Kirby Hocutt, league administrators made it clear they believe Sorsby should not be permitted to play.
The call marked the first step in a three-stage process the Big 12 intends to undertake regarding the situation. Commissioner Yormark described the conversation as thoughtful and productive, noting that while many directors voiced their opinions, further dialogue would remain within the conference until an official report is issued. The league’s reaction has been characterised by strong language, with executives previously describing the judge’s decision as disheartening and sad.
On Thursday, the Big 12 executive board, chaired by Kansas chancellor Doug Girod, is scheduled to meet with Yormark to review options moving forward. This is expected to be followed by a meeting of the full board of presidents and chancellors early next week. Sources indicate these gatherings are designed to determine whether the conference can impose disciplinary measures independent of the NCAA’s position.
The legal timeline suggests that an NCAA appeal is unlikely to alter Sorsby’s status for the current season, as he is expected to exhaust his eligibility after the 2026 campaign. The ruling in Texas does not permit the NCAA to forbid Sorsby from practicing, playing, or otherwise participating for Texas Tech this season, leaving the conference to determine its own response under its internal governance structures.
The Big 12 is considering options under conference bylaw 3.6, which grants the league autonomy to impose disciplinary measures. Potential sanctions could include prohibitions on Sorsby’s appearance in postseason or televised events, restrictions on revenue distributions, and limitations on recruiting or scholarships. It remains uncertain whether the executive board or the full board of presidents and chancellors will ultimately rule Sorsby ineligible or prevent him from playing, despite the preference expressed by athletic directors during the initial call.
