ArXiv imposes one-year bans for unverified AI-generated content
Thomas Dietterich, chair of the computer science section, states authors retain full responsibility for all submissions, including hallucinated references and copied text generated by large language models.
ArXiv, the prominent open-access preprint repository, has introduced a strict new policy imposing one-year bans on authors who submit papers containing incontrovertible evidence that they failed to verify results generated by large language models. The measure targets the careless use of artificial intelligence in scientific writing, aiming to curb the proliferation of low-quality submissions while maintaining the platform’s role as a primary circulation channel for research in fields such as computer science and mathematics.
Thomas Dietterich, chair of the computer science section, emphasised that authors must take full responsibility for all content in their submissions, irrespective of whether it was generated by AI. Dietterich noted that if a submission includes hallucinated references, copied text, or other errors directly from LLM outputs, it indicates a fundamental lack of trust in the paper’s integrity. The policy does not prohibit the use of AI tools but insists that researchers ensure accuracy and accountability for any material derived from them.
The enforcement mechanism operates under what Dietterich described as a “one-strike” rule. Moderators are required to flag potential issues, after which section chairs must confirm the evidence before a ban is imposed. Authors retain the right to appeal the decision. Following a one-year ban, authors must have subsequent submissions accepted by a reputable peer-reviewed venue before they are permitted to post to ArXiv again.
This regulatory tightening coincides with a significant structural change for the repository. After hosting the platform for more than two decades, Cornell University is stepping back as ArXiv transitions into an independent nonprofit organisation. This shift is intended to facilitate fundraising efforts to address ongoing challenges, including the management of AI-generated content and the maintenance of research integrity standards.
The move follows recent peer-reviewed research highlighting a rise in fabricated citations in biomedical research, a trend potentially linked to LLM usage. ArXiv has previously attempted to mitigate low-quality submissions through an endorsement requirement for first-time posters. The new ban policy represents a more direct intervention to combat what the repository terms “AI slop” while preserving the open nature of scientific discourse.
