Business

America Inc holds tight grip on allied governments, report says

The Economist analysis highlights the entrenched power of US technology and defence firms in allied capitals, coinciding with shifts in the White House press corps.

Editorial persona
Owen Mercer
Markets and Finance Editor
Published
Draft
Source: The Economist · View original source
Business
No image available
Palantir and Lockheed exert disproportionate influence over international partners despite modest spending shares

US technology and defence firms are maintaining a strong and difficult-to-remove influence over allied governments, according to reporting by The Economist. The analysis identifies companies such as Palantir and Lockheed as key players in this dynamic, noting that their sway persists despite accounting for a relatively small share of overall government spending.

The publication characterises this relationship as a "tight grip" that is hard to shake, suggesting a level of structural or political entrenchment that goes beyond simple market dominance. While the specific mechanisms by which these firms maintain their influence are not detailed in the summary, the narrative points to a persistent presence in allied policy and procurement environments.

This assessment of American corporate power comes against a backdrop of recent personnel changes within the US administration. Karoline Leavitt has stepped down as White House press secretary, concluding an 18-month tenure under President Donald Trump. Leavitt, described as the youngest White House spokesperson, had significantly altered the administration’s media strategy alongside communications director Steven Cheung.

The departure of Leavitt marks the end of a period where the administration’s communications approach was reshaped, yet the underlying influence of US industry on allied states appears to remain intact. The Economist’s focus on Palantir and Lockheed underscores how specific entities can wield outsized impact relative to their financial footprint in government budgets.

The report does not quantify the exact metrics defining the "small share of spending" attributed to these firms, nor does it provide evidence of illegality or corruption. Instead, it frames the situation as a notable feature of the current geopolitical and commercial landscape, where US companies have secured a durable position within allied governments.

Continue reading

More from Business

Read next: Oil-supply crisis may set the stage for Gulf investment boom
Read next: US House faces narrowing window for AI regulation
Read next: Anthropic’s Amodei calls China toughest test for proposed AI slowdown