
US judge dismisses Penske Media and Chegg cases over Google AI Overviews
Judge Amit Mehta found the companies had not convincingly argued that Google used its search monopoly to gain an antitrust advantage.
Event
Judge Amit Mehta dismissed lawsuits by Penske Media Corporation and Chegg alleging Google’s AI Overviews diverted traffic and misused their content. He found the companies had not convincingly argued that Google leveraged its search monopoly in violation of antitrust laws.
2 published stories · artificial-intelligence · source reliability 67%

Judge Amit Mehta found the companies had not convincingly argued that Google used its search monopoly to gain an antitrust advantage.
Background
US District Judge Amit Mehta dismissed antitrust lawsuits from Penske Media Corporation and Chegg over Google’s AI Overviews. The companies alleged the feature diverted web traffic and misused their content; Chegg also claimed websites faced pressure to allow AI scraping to remain in Google Search. Mehta found they had not convincingly argued that Google used its search monopoly to obtain content or gain an unfair publishing advantage. The dismissal does not establish that the alleged harms did not occur.
US District Judge Amit Mehta dismissed antitrust lawsuits from Penske Media Corporation and Chegg over Google’s AI Overviews. The companies alleged the feature diverted web traffic and misused their content; Chegg also claimed websites faced pressure to allow AI scraping to remai
Fact cards
Key entities: Google, Penske Media Corporation, Chegg, Amit Mehta.
What did Penske Media and Chegg allege? They alleged AI Overviews diverted traffic and harmed publisher revenue; Chegg also alleged pressure to allow AI scraping to remain in search results. Why were the lawsuits dismissed? Mehta found the companies had not convincingly argued th
Engadget | https://www.engadget.com/2275023/judge-dismisses-lawsuits-claiming-googles-ai-overviews-siphon-web-traffic | published 2026-10-01T19:20:32.000Z | primary source | Engadget | Reports the dismissals, allegations and the judge’s reasoning. | Event digest | Concise summary
2024: Mehta ruled that Google maintained a monopoly in online search services. 2026-10-01: Mehta dismissed the Penske Media and Chegg lawsuits over AI Overviews.
Timeline
Mehta ruled that Google maintained a monopoly in online search services.
Mehta dismissed the Penske Media and Chegg lawsuits over AI Overviews.
FAQ
They alleged AI Overviews diverted traffic and harmed publisher revenue; Chegg also alleged pressure to allow AI scraping to remain in search results.
Mehta found the companies had not convincingly argued that Google leveraged its search monopoly in violation of antitrust laws.
The retrieved material says publishers can exclude webpages from use in AI Overviews while keeping them in traditional search results.
The retrieved material does not say.
They alleged Google’s AI search features diverted traffic and harmed revenue, and that publishers had to provide content or risk losing search visibility.
He wrote that expecting to receive search traffic is not an agreement, and said lawmakers should address the economic effects of new innovation.
The Information reported a pilot involving about 100 publishers and AI Overviews, AI Mode and Gemini; the supplied material gives no further details.